scheme is entitled to have the salary of
any appointment, to which he may be promot-
ed, fixed in dollars, but that does not imply
that it is necessary to create a salary, stat-
A
273
of sterling salaries, which in para-
graph 3 of my despatch No.75 of the
36287/11
9th of March I have suggested should
>
ed in dollars, for such a post, unless it is
one that was not in existence when the sterl-
ing scheme was framed.
This is not the case in
the present instance. The post of Deputy
Superintendent of Police was in existence
before the sterling scheme was framed and
the salary then attached to it, $3600 ris-
ing to $4200 by triennial increments of
$300, is that which must be drawn by an
any
officer in receipt of a dollar salary, who
is appointed to it.
3. If, therefore, I had been able to
approve the appointment of Mr Hallifax to be
Deputy Superintendent, it would have been on
the condition that he would either receive
salary at this rate in dollars or would exer-
cise the option of accepting the new scale
be given to existing officers.
4.
It would clearly not be to
Ir Hallifax's advantage to accept the
dollar salary and as in the same des-
patch, paragraph 6, I have approved
Kaino
the proposal that elifaxh
present post should be placed in
Class II of the sterling scheme, he
will, if he now decides to accept a
sterling salary, be practically as
well off in his present post as he
would be as Deputy Superintendent of
Police.
J
5. part, however, from this
question of salary I regret that I am
unable to approve the suggestion that
Mr Hallifax should succeed Captain
of
Lyons.
In paragraph 8 of my despatch No.
75
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.